For every unlisted fund manager, a fundamental question is always encountered. How should we handle our daily funds management operations? This usually involves a choice of scaling your internal team or outsourcing your registry to a third party.
While outsourcing has often been a standard fix for growing pains or to reduce headcount, the continued rise of purpose-built funds management software and technology has given fund managers more control than ever before.
The choice is not simply about "handling" funds admin, it's about the entire digital experience. The decision involves considerations around operational scalability, building investor trust, and data ownership and sovereignty.
Here is a breakdown of the three operating models defining the unlisted funds landscape today.
For a long time, the in-house days involved multiple team members managing various Excel spreadsheets across different funds. The modern version of this model is now powered by purpose-built software designed for funds administration and registry operations. This approach provides significant benefits, such as built-in user controls, audit trails, operational efficiencies and the introduction of professional branded investor portals and digital investor onboarding experiences.
The outsourced approach involves fund managers handing the keys over to a third-party administrator. The third-party administrator handles the daily grind, including: investor applications, distributions, transactions, reporting and other registry functions. This helps save time and potentially reduce costs by reducing headcount. This allows you and your team to focus on other core aspects, such as growing the business.
The hybrid approach is the newest approach. Consider it the new kid on the block, a blend of both in-house and outsourced approaches. A fund manager might keep their flagship funds in-house to maintain a high-touch experience with investors, while outsourcing legacy or highly complex funds to third-party administrators.
| In-House (With UNITISE) | Outsourced | Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investor Experience | Elite & Branded | Standard | Mixed |
| Data & Operational Control | 100% Ownership & Control | Low - Administrator usually controls this. | Segmented - Data may be in different systems. |
| Speed to Action | Instant and Highly Reactive | Medium to Delayed | Variable |
The "right" model is a moving target as business requirements change and are influenced by various factors at different business stages. The traditional reason to outsource, was to reduce headcount or fix time-consuming operational processes. However, with a platform like Titanium UNITISE, a small number of team members can efficiently handle all aspects of funds management operations.
In today's world, investor expectations continue to shift toward real-time transparency. This likely gives fund managers who are willing to invest in their own in-house technology the edge. By choosing an in-house software model, you're investing in and building scalable infrastructure to maintain efficient fund operations, investor relationships, all whilst ensuring 100% data ownership and integrity.
Are you ready to discuss your operating model?
Contact us for a demo of Titanium UNITISE and see how our Funds Management, Investor Portal and Digital Investor Onboarding Software solutions could benefit your in-house operations.
Disclaimer: The information on Titanium Digital Insights is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice. Titanium is a software company, and users should consult qualified professionals to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.